For example, Senenmut reports on different monuments about the work done in Karnak, Deir el-Bahari, Ascheru and Luxor and that all the work in the temples of the Amun and the Mut was completed under his supervision.

In his tomb, TT11, the so-called "Northampton-Stela" was discovered. This stela enumerates the work, for which Dhout claimed the responsibility for himself. Among the work listed he tells that he had been responsible for the production at a pair of obelisks, he literally says:

""I was the highest commander, who had given the orders. I led the craftsmen during their work on the two large obelisks, which were about 108 ells (approx. 54 m) high and completely covered with electron. They fulfilled the two lands with their lighting."

The text does not specify the obelisks he is talking about. Obviously, he can not talk about the 2nd pair of obelisks erected by Hatshepsut because these do not fit the specification anyhow (the height of the one which is still standing is approx. 29 m). Possibly, the text refers to the first pair erected by Hatshepsut but from this pair only rubble is remaining, so that their height is unclear. Furthermore, there are certain doubts about, whether the Egyptians were technical able, to manufacture obelisks of this height. Most likely, the height mentioned in the text is a mistake or a propagandistic exaggeration.

Duauneheh mentions the manufacturing of columns, gates, false doors and boxes under his supervision.

The steward Amenhotep had been responsible for the production of carriages, shrines, statues, collars and obelisks for the temple of Amun.

Hapuseneb, High Priest of Amun, was responsible for the building of a ship, a gate, a shrine, for the production of temple equipment, door wings and buildings.

The new office covered the command of the total domain, the granary, the cattle stock, the fields and gardens, the treasury, the building "industry" and the craftsmen of the temple. However, the accumulation of several offices in one hand remained limited to the upper hierarchic levels of the administration, thus on the (total) control of the domain and on the "High Priest" of the temple. In the lower levels it was rather an exception.

Based on the information about the people who were appointed to an office also the social groups, from which Hatshepsut recruited them, can be classified:
- "new" officials from common origin
- foreigners
- officials who had already served for a long time
- members of the provincial aristocracy
- offsprings of old-established families whose members had served frequently as officials

Numerous members of the temple administration were - if ascertainable - from the group of the "new" officials from common origin:
the director of total domain, Senenmut, the 2. Priest of Amun, Pui-em-Re, and the construction supervisor of the temple, Amen-hotep, mentioned as the only title of their fathers the title "Honorable" (zAb). The chief of the treasury, Dhout, originates from the provincial aristocracy of Hermopolis, the chiefs of the granary, Ahmose Pen-nechbet, probably originates from a family, which has already lived at Thebes for a long time. On the other hand, the father of the High Priest, Hapuseneb, was already employed as a "lector" in the temple of Karnak.

summarized after:
Eichler, "Die Verwaltung des "Hauses des Amun" in der 18. Dynastie.", 2000

Well documented is the career of an official called Seni, who obviously was already active during the reign of Ahmose. During the 3. regnal year of Thutmosis I., he was appointed to "Viceroy by Kush" and he had retired from the office under Thutmosis II. (Pamminger, 1992). Furthermore, it seems to be quite clear that after the death of Hatshepsut and starting with regnal year 23 of Thutmosis III., Nehi (NHj) served as the viceroy. During the reign of the Hatshepsut, i.e. between Seni and Nehi, two officials, Inebni and Amen-em-nekhu, may have held this office

With regard to Amen-em-nekhu, it is well documented that - in regnal year 18 of Hatshepsut - he has been the "Viceroy of Kush", possibly, another, but destroyed inscription dated to regnal year 20 refers to him.