Red Chapel of Hatshepsut
Historical Texts on the South-Wall
Election of Hatshepsut by the King of Gods
The step of Hatshepsut from regent to Pharao which resulted in a double
kingship was surely a violation of the Maat - because there could be only
one "Horus". One can only speculate about the motivation of Hatshepsut or
about the political background, but one must assume that this step had
been carefully prepared.
Gundlach (1998) has described the steps to achieve the kingship and
their ritual execution especially using Hatshepsut as an example. Apart from the
legitimation by divine generation and birth - which, naturally, attained validity
only by taking over the government and therefore, has been put down in
writing only after the event - the accession to the throne must be also visibly prepared, e.g.
because of a designation by the predecessor and/or a divine oracle. The designation by the predecessor is
not applicable to Hatshepsut, of course she claimed to have been chosen
as the successor to the throne by her father, Thutmosis I, but probably only
afterwards, because Thutmosis II followed Thutmosis I.
Of course, the election by Amun-Ra, the King of Gods, could "be organized"
by a public oracle and, thus, became for all those present (a) "real
history". As a rule the public election by an oracle has been
"celebrated" after the accession to the throne. However, since
Hatshepsut as the regent actually held all political power it might not have been a
problem to get the oracle "celebrated" before her accession to the throne.
The step to kingship are very well testified by texts on the monuments
of Hatshepsut. Thus, the report about the election by an oracle of Amun-Ra and also
coronation of the queen are presented on the external walls of the Red Chapel.
With regard to the coronation report on the Red Chapel there is a parallel
text at Djeser djeseru, there, however, as continuation of the Myth of
Birth shown on the northern wing of the 2nd portico.
"historical texts" (s. a. "Texts Historique", Lacau and
Chevrier, 1977 - 1979) are presented on the 2nd register (from below),
i.e. the first row of the red quartzite blocks, particularly on the southern and northern side wall.
On the south wall the report about the oracle was written on the blocks:
222, 35, 184, 295 (from left to the right). I am indebted Michael
Tilgner for the following summary of Lacau and Chevrier (1977 - 1979), as well as
transcription and German translation of the text on
these 4 blocks.
Direction of Reading
The direction of reading is exceptional. The text refers to the queen
who enters the chapel at the western gate (i.e. from the left side if seen
from standing outside in front of the south-wall). The queen turns to the east (right) part of the
chapel - as to say "face to face - where the god Amun is located. Thus, the signs should be
read - because the text addresses the queen - from right to left (and vice
versa on the north-wall). This is indeed the case
because all signs are aligned to the right and, therefore, to be read from
right to left inside a column.
However, the complete text is written retrograde, i.e. deviating from the
alignment of the signs blocks and columns successively are to be read from left
to right. In their publication about the Red Chapel Lacau and Chevrier discussed the
reasons (1977 - 1979; in §155).
The chapel was enclosed into a hall whose walls were about 20
m long, so that a corridor was formed around the chapel. If the columns would have been arranged
in the direction of reading (i.e. from right to left), then one would have had to go up to the end of the
corridor in order to look for the beginning of the text - that does not appear
Lacau and Chevrier refer to parallel places where the retrograde way of writing was
used for the same reason (e.g. the corresponding text at Deir el-Bahari).
Apart from Lacau u. Chevrier
(1977 - 1979) Grimm, A., Schoske, S. (1999), Gundlach, R. (1998) and Malte Römer
(2003) were consulted.
[m-x.t nn] (1) wDA Hm=f Hr bjA[.t] psD.t=f m Sms.w.t=f
"[Afterwards] his majesty [= Amun] took off to work a 'miracle';
his Ennead (was) in his entourage."
nn (2) grt jr.t bjAy.t=f r aHa.w nb n nj-sw.t
"However, there was no performance of his 'miracle' in any 'location'
of the king."
tA r-Dr=f (3) Ssp.n sgr
"The whole country, it was quiet (= started to be quiet)."
n rx=tw j.n Sps.w nj-sw.t
"'Not one knows ', said the nobles of the king"
wr.w (4) aH wAH=n Hr
"the nobles of the palace: ' Let us bend the head!'"
jmj.w-x.t=f Hr sj jSst
"(and) his followers: ' Why?'"
sAj.w-jb (5) xpr[.w] m tp-Sw
"The wise (men) are (got) ignorant in the hearts."
jb.w=sn sdA[.w] Xr bjAy.t=f
"Their hearts trembled / shaked under the impression of his
spr (6) Hm=f r tp jtrw Hr bjAy.t aA.t wrt
"His majesty (= Amun) got to the river under very great
r rw.tj n (7) aH nj-sw.t
"at both gates of the royal palace"
ntj Hr gs n wA.t wdHw
"which are on the side of the sacrificial route."
m-x.t nn rdj.t
"Afterwards: Turn back...."
(8) Hr m-xd
"of the face to the north."
n rx=tw ntt jr.tj=fj
"Not one knew what he would do."
nn ... (9) [xr Hr-tp] Drw m xpr.w nTr pn
"without ... about an obstacle (?) in the guise of this God"
wn.j[n Hm n] (10) nb-r-Dr sxd[.w] n Hr=f r jAbt.t Hr bjAy.t aA.t wrt
"Then the majesty of the overlord was down with the head facing to
the east, with very great 'miracles',"
(11) r rw.tj jmn.t aH n wsx.t n.t nn-wA=j-r=f
"at the western gates of the palace in the large forecourt (called)
' I do not go away from him'"
ntj Hr (12) mAa n tp itrw
"who was on the shore of the river."
jw.jn rs nb.t tA.wj m-Xnw Dsr.w nw aH=s
"Now there came the Mistress of the Two Lands out of the holiness
of her palace."
(13) wn.xr=s Hr rdj.t jAw m xsfw nb nTr.w
"Then she gave praise during the approach of the Lord of Gods"
(14) m-x.t-nn rdj.t=s sy Hr X.t=s m-bAH-a Hm=f
"Then she buckled on her belly before his majesty"
m - Block 184 -
wr.wj nn r sxr.w Hm=k
"'How big is this according to the plans of your majesty! ..."
- oder auch:
"... oh), you are my father (= you my father), ..."
(16) kA ntt nb.t
"... he has invented all existing."
jSst pw mr.t.n=k xpr
"What is it, that you love so that it should be done?"
jrj=j js (17) xft wD.t.n=k [nb]
"I do also / nevertheless (all) according from what you have ordered.'"
wn.jn Hm n nTr pn Hr bjAy.t aA.t wrt (18) aSA wr sp 2
"There the God's majesty did this very great 'miracle'; very often,
in great masses."
m-x.t-nn rdj.t=f sy Xr-HA.t=f
"Then he placed her (= Hatshepsut) before himself ..."
s.xnt=s [= s.xnt=f sy] (19) r Hw.t aA.t mAa.t
"... and led her to the ' Great House of Maat'."
Ssp.n=s Xkr.w Hm.t=s
"She received the jewellery of her majesty (= Maat) ..."
apr.w=s n (20) Hm.t-nTr
"... (and) her jewellery of the God's Wife, ..."
wnn m-xnt Hw.t=f nTr
"...who was inside of his temple."
wn.jn Hm n nb-r-Dr Hr s.(21)aSA bjAy.t Hr=s
"Then the majesty of the overlord (= Amun) multiplied "the
'miracles" on her ..."
r-gs mw.t=s qmA.t nfr[.w]=s Hw.t-Hr Hr.t-tp wAs.t
"in the presence of her mother who has created her beauty /
perfection, Hathor, the First of Thebes, ..."
(22) nb.t p.t nb.t jdb.wj
"... Lady of Heaven, Lady of the Two Banks (= Egypt) ..."
xntj.t s.t m wADy.t rnn.t sy m X.t[=s]
"... first one on the place of the portico with papyrus-columns who has
risen her in her body.
This block is difficult to read! Lacau / Chevrier made an attempt to
reconstruct the text:
(23) ... mH Ha=s - oder - Sd Ha=s ...
"... who nourishes her body ..."
(24) ... m anx wAs ...
"... in life (and) happiness ..."
(25) ... r[n] wr ...
"... the Great Name ..."
(26) ... .w.t ...
(27) ............ sH-nTr pn
"... this hall of the god...."
(28)................ aA-xpr-kA-ra] ..................
"......... Aa-cheper-ka-Ra ................... made.. ."
(29) ..... mnw [nfr n] Hm n nTr pn
".... the beautiful monument for the majesty of this god (= Amun)"
|With the help of the version of the oracle text from Deir
el-Bahari Lacau and Chevrier try to complete the version of the Red Chapel.
Due to the version from Deir el Bahari the following sings can be
complemented in the rows 27 and 28:
(27) ... m
"... in this hall of the god ..."
(28) n wAH nj-sw.t jT [m nx.t
oder ähnlich] ...... nj-sw.t-bj.t
"... for sacrifices made by the king whom acquires to himself [by
force] ...the king of Upper and Lower Egypt, Aa-cheper-ka-Ra"
|In conclusion it has to be noted that after the
publication of Lacau and Chevrier (1977 - 1979) William Murnane has
suggested an alternative reading or translation for some passages
(Murnane, W., "Unpublished Fragments of Hatshepsut's Historical
Inscription from Her Sanctuary at Karnak", Serapis 6, 1980). Base on old
photographs of single blocks which were in the possession of the Oriental
Institute, Chicago, he discussed in this publication not only the hardly
readable block 295, but also the blocks 286 and
280 which likewise belong
in the 2nd register and which already had been reused in the antiquity (from Rameses II) whereby their inscriptions were destroyed to a great extent.
Since Murnane himself classified the differences to the publication of
Lacau and Chevrier as "not of major significance", here it is just
referred to his publication.